Most organisations and business groupings have grown with a cultural habit of physical or face to face meetings. We have all historically travelled distances small or large to sit in rooms with colleagues or peers to exchange words.
For decades no one gave this routine much thought - aside from some organisations that questioned the value of meetings generally from time to time. But technology mediated meetings are now re-casting face to face meetings profoundly. The advent of usable services for talking, sharing content through screens and for viewing each other in some instances, has started to shift our thinking.
- Do we need to meet physically and why?
- Which meetings can and should be online?
- What are the upsides and downsides?
The rationale for NOT meeting physically is clear:
- Saving time
- Saving travel cost
- Saving carbon impact
- Reducing stress
In my own work and that of IBF we have a default assumption that meetings should be online unless there are clear reasons for meeting in person. Reasons to meet in person seem to be:
- Relationship building
- Handling sensitive matters - particularly personal issues
- Concentrating at high levels
Beyond that we struggle to see the need to meet physically. What is interesting is how one face to face meetings can then provide enough foundation for online meetings for up to 12 - 18 months.
Many people still baulk at this thinking, believing we will end up working in atomized worlds where we are left in technical isolation. That is just not true in practice if we start to understand how to select meeting formats based on the above criteria. Timothy Leary, the Harvard Professor and LSD "Guru" who before his death saw the internet future clearly said that "in the future, all physical meetings will become sacred".
What did he mean? He meant, in my view, that when we do meet in person, it will be for a good and compelling reason that gives the meeting real value. It is somehow "wrong" on many levels to sit in a meeting with content that could be easily shared online. It offends our planet and shows a lack of technical understanding.
Face to face meetings and events and conferences are essentially at the end of their shelf life. We have exhausted the medium of face to face meetings. We know what they can do and no matter how good the agenda, no matter how well facilitated and how smart the venue, the value limits are now defined. Most conferences we attend are just an excuse to chat to peers in coffee breaks.......i.e. a chance for relationship and trust building. In my pertsonal view, they are also a brutal and expensive indulgence environmentally and organisations should consider boycotting such events from a corporate ethics stance.
On the other hand, we are in the foothills in our knowledge of how to use online meetings. We experiment, make mistakes, learn, progress - all the while the technology advances. Still most organisations are nervous or at early stages in using these meeting tools but this will advance in coming decades and face to face meetings will counter (as they are now) to flounder.
The interesting area that is virtually never mentioned is the power that comes from seeing how the online and offline meetings can work together. One example we are experimenting with at IBF is IBF 24. This is a 24 hour online global intranet gathering we are hosting for intranet managers and team on 18 - 19 June. We are pioneering a new meeting format with live material, talks etc with several hundred online at any one moment. The intriguing part is that attendees will be located in their own offices with colleagues or other visiting organisations and they will participate together.
The cost of attending is a fraction of attending a conference in person: no travel, hotels or expensive event passes and no carbon impact and no travel stress. But by attending online "together" colleagues can experience the face to face with the online. Other exercises have been conducted on smaller scales in some enterprises but this IBF 24 pilot event will try to innovate in the online space.
Why are we all still investing so much time and energy in the exhausted medium of face to face meetings when meetings enabled through technology offer so much more scope and experience?